<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Soccer On Dish - Latest Comments in Let&amp;#8217;s not get our hopes up</title><link>http://soccerondish.disqus.com/</link><description>Soccer Satellite News</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:35:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s not get our hopes up</title><link>http://www.soccerondish.com/lets-not-get-our-hopes-up/29#comment-1785080</link><description>A valid point last year. But what I've been told is that to this point, it's more about the logistics and the studio space for FSC than it is about the bandwidth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Cahir</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s not get our hopes up</title><link>http://www.soccerondish.com/lets-not-get-our-hopes-up/29#comment-1785079</link><description>On one of the gaffer's podcasts last year with a Setanta spokesperson, it was said the amount of bandwidth needed would be quite expensive also to deliver HD.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fsquid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:55:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>